There’s not much talk anymore about the Generation Gap – at least not in terms of crazy teens and their rock ‘n’ roll music. But there’s another kind of Generation Gap that has the FTC concerned: the compliance gap between the established standards of the National Do Not Call Registry and the way some companies are using lists from lead generators without careful consideration of how those lists were compiled. An FTC set
Most consumers know that creditors use information about them and their credit experiences – like the number and type of accounts they have, their bill paying history, and whether they pay their bills on time – to create a credit score, which helps predict how creditworthy they are.
When someone mentions the FTC, the EEOC, and the FCRA in the same sentence, it may sound like a ladle of alphabet soup. What’s really being served up is a new joint publication by the Federal Trade Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that talks about how the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the mandate to comply with anti-discrimination laws intersect when employers use background checks in personnel decisions.
Advertisers that sell health products should know the legal standards by now, but to those resistant to the message, a federal judge in California spelled them out again in a $2.2 million judgment against the marketers of two diabetes products – Diabetic Pack and Insulin Resistance Pack.
Consumers who tuned in to programs like the Today Show, Daybreak USA, and local newscasts may have caught interviews with guests billed as “The Safety Mom,” a home security expert, or a tech expert. Among the products they reviewed was ADT’s Pulse Home Monitoring System. Describing it as “amazing” or “incredible,” they offered glowing details about its capabilities, safety benefits, and cost. But according to the FTC, here's one material fact that wasn’t discussed: ADT had paid the three spokespersons a total of mor