Jurisdiction fiction?

South Dakota can be lovely this time of year, but consumers struggling financially shouldn’t have to travel there to respond to actions filed against them in a tribal court that doesn’t have jurisdiction over their case. That’s what the FTC has alleged in its amended complaint against Payday Financial, LLC, a company that pitches its short-term, high-fee loans in TV ads and online.

According to the FTC, when people fall behind in their payments, Payday Financial unfairly and deceptively manipulates the legal system by filing suits against them in the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court and trying to get a tribal court order to garnish their wages. But the FTC says that the tribal court doesn’t have jurisdiction over claims against people who don’t belong to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and who don’t live on the reservation or elsewhere in South Dakota.

The FTC has charged that Payday Financial’s tribal court suits are unfair, and that its contract language about where the suits would be brought is deceptive.

In its original complaint, the FTC alleged that the defendants illegally tried to garnish employees’ wages without a court order. The FTC also alleged that they violated the FTC Act by:

  • falsely telling employers they had legal authority to garnish an employee’s wages without first getting a court order;
  • falsely telling employers they had given employees an opportunity to dispute the debt; and
  • unfairly disclosing the existence and amount of consumers’ supposed debts to their employers and co-workers, without the consumers’ knowledge or consent.

The FTC has also charged the defendants with violations of the Credit Practices Rule by requiring people taking out payday loans to agree to have wages taken directly out of their paychecks if they default. The FTC says the defendants also violated the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E by requiring authorization for recurring electronic payments from consumers’ bank accounts as a condition of getting the loans. The amended complaint asks for civil penalties for the alleged violations of the Credit Practices Rule.

The action is pending in federal court in South Dakota.
 

2 Comments

>> Leave a Comment | Comment Policy

These corrupt bullies are in fact thieves who are robbing the vulnerable and desperate consumers. I hope they get what they deserve.

Wow, These people are so sleazy. Imagine how much good they could've done in the world if they would have put their immense amount of time and energy that they used to find these loop holes for bullying and screwing people over. These loans to begin with are geared towards people in desperate situations, add to that at their place of employment their boss and coworkers are being harassed which is embarrassing for everybody. Not to mention he/she can lose the very job they need to pay the loan back, if the boss isn't very understanding. Add in the trip to S Dakota to visit the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court, who are being manipulated by these heartless subhuman bullies. I hope they get exactly what they deserve. I am sure the judge will be fair and impartial and abide by the laws of the USA, which is alot more than these people have supposedly given everyone involved in their scheme.

Leave A Comment

Don't use this blog to report fraud or deceptive practices. To file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, please use the FTC Complaint Assistant.

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act and the Federal Information Security Management Act authorize this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of our public records system, and user names are also part of our computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in our Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how we handle information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.