Business Blog
FTC challenges claims that products could treat side effects of cancer treatment
The FTC’s fight against the deceptive marketing of unproven cancer treatments goes back to the early days of the agency, and it’s disappointing that we still need to bring cases of that nature. But you can add the FTC’s settlement with Florida-based CellMark Biopharma and CEO Derek Vest to that list – and the deceptive claims they pitched to people battling cancer are particularly disconcerting.
Two serious complications of cancer treatment are cachexia (the wasting syndrome some patients experience) and “chemo fog” (the chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction that patients often report). CellMark claimed to have the answer to both problems.
Selling for $248 for a one-month supply, CellAssure was advertised to treat cachexia and cancer-related malnutrition. In addition, according to the FTC, the defendants conveyed to consumers that CellAssure would improve cancer patients’ ability to withstand the rigors of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. But that’s not all. The defendants also claimed that the product “exhibits anti-cancer/anti-tumor effects” and that CellAssure’s ingredients had been “clinically proven” to provide the advertised benefits.
Marketed to treat the memory loss and cognitive impairment sometimes reported during and after chemotherapy, a one-month supply of Cognify cost cancer patients $79. According to ads, Cognify would “protect brain cells/neuro-transmitters against toxins,” “improve cognitive functioning, memory, and processing,” and “stimulate the growth of new brain cells” in patients undergoing chemo. The company used a similar “don’t just take our word for it” tactic by claiming that Cognify’s ingredients were “clinically proven.”
But according to the FTC, the defendants didn’t have sound science to back up their promises. What’s more, the complaint charges that the company’s “clinically proven” claims were false.
The settlement in the case requires the defendants to have randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled testing conducted by qualified researchers to support future cancer- or disease-related claims for dietary supplements, foods, or drugs. Other health claims will need “competent and reliable scientific evidence,” as that phrase is defined in the order. The settlement also prohibits misrepresentations about tests, studies, or research.
The terms of the settlement apply just to CellMark and CEO Derek Vest – who, by the way, is serving time in federal prison for criminal conduct related to the sale of other dietary supplements. But the case reminds marketers just how seriously the FTC takes claims directed to cancer patients and others battling serious medical conditions.
There’s also a message for people dealing with a cancer diagnosis or the side effects of cancer treatment. Just because a product is available online or at a drugstore or health food shop is no guarantee that it’s effective. For some patients, certain over-the-counter formulations can interfere with proven treatments and may even be downright dangerous. Talk with your doctor before taking anything, including dietary supplements, vitamins, and other products.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.